On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:51:41 +0700, Marco Pfatschbacher <mpf@mailq.de>
wrote:
quoted text > On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 05:14:04PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
>> The ifconfig:
>> Machine A#
> [...]
>> vlan2: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu
>> 1500
>> lladdr 00:15:17:25:0a:9e
>> vlan: 2 priority: 0 parent interface: em2
>> groups: vlan
>> inet6 fe80::215:17ff:fe25:a9e%vlan2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9
>> vlan22: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu
>> 1500
>> lladdr 00:15:17:25:0a:9d
>> vlan: 22 priority: 0 parent interface: em0
>> groups: vlan
>> inet6 fe80::215:17ff:fe25:a9d%vlan22 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa
> [...]
>> carp0: flags=b843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,LINK0,LINK1,MULTICAST>
>> mtu
>> 1500
>> lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:01
>> carp: MASTER carpdev vlan2 vhid 1 advbase 1 advskew 0
>> groups: carp
>> inet6 fe80::200:5eff:fe00:101%carp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xc
>> inet 202.149.93.12 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 202.149.93.15
>> carp1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>> lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:02
>> carp: BACKUP carpdev vlan2 vhid 2 advbase 1 advskew 100
>> groups: carp
>> inet6 fe80::200:5eff:fe00:102%carp1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd
>> inet 202.149.93.12 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 202.149.93.15
>> carp2: flags=b843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,LINK0,LINK1,MULTICAST>
>> mtu
>> 1500
>> lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:03
>> carp: MASTER carpdev vlan22 vhid 3 advbase 1 advskew 0
>> groups: carp
>> inet6 fe80::200:5eff:fe00:103%carp2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xe
>> inet 202.149.93.97 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 202.149.93.111
>> carp3: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>> lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:04
>> carp: BACKUP carpdev vlan22 vhid 4 advbase 1 advskew 100
>> groups: carp
>> inet6 fe80::200:5eff:fe00:104%carp3 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xf
>> inet 202.149.93.97 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 202.149.93.111
>
> vlan2 and vlan22 need an IP in the same network as their carp interfaces.
> IP Balancing currently doesn't work for the 'carpdev is ip-less' case.
Hi,
Thanks for the clue, so.. one other thing, for IP Load Balancing, I don't
need the net.inet.arpbalance to 1, am I correct?
Thanks,
Insan
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
http://www.opera.com/mail/