Same here. I've been following IPv6 for a while and he has been a
central figure whose name is everywhere. I expect that much of
wikipedia's resistance stems from the ignorance antagonism towards IPv6
in the mainstream press.
However, whether there are bonafide fifth columnists even at wiki, or
plain old ignorance, or simply malevolent emergent behavior,
technologies and methods that put Redmond products in bad light get
actively pushed aside or hidden.
IPv6 brings to light a whole slew of insurmountable design and
implementation problems in the Redmond movement's gimmicks - er -
products. And the way we do currently networking in general with IPv4.
So in addition to other factors, there are those with incentive to
postpone general knowledge and deployment of IPv6.
Well put.
Regards,
-Lars