ropers wrote:
Same here. I've been following IPv6 for a while and he has been a
central figure whose name is everywhere. I expect that much of
wikipedia's resistance stems from the ignorance antagonism towards IPv6
in the mainstream press.
> The Internet will only be able to continue to grow because of IPv6,
However, whether there are bonafide fifth columnists even at wiki, or
plain old ignorance, or simply malevolent emergent behavior,
technologies and methods that put Redmond products in bad light get
actively pushed aside or hidden.
IPv6 brings to light a whole slew of insurmountable design and
implementation problems in the Redmond movement's gimmicks - er -
products. And the way we do currently networking in general with IPv4.
So in addition to other factors, there are those with incentive to
postpone general knowledge and deployment of IPv6.
> In short, his work (and IPv6 advocacy) will prove vital for the future
Well put.
Regards,
-Lars
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Justin Piszcz | exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 / SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
