On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:04:15 +0200, ropers wrote:

quoted text
>On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy <tom@ctors.net> wrote:
>> I think it should have been 1000001 instead of 100001.
>
>Gord wrote:
>> Someone is giving it a go:
>> http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027
>
>That's real interesting, guys.
>TheRaven64 writes that (0)100001 1010101 is (caesar-)ciphertext for Au.
>But going with Tom's suggestion of a missing 0, 1000001 1010101 is
>plaintext for AU.
>
>So is Gold the answer or is it "not you"?
>I dunno, but me likey! :)
>
>--ropers
>

Well back on last Sunday I put my guess on undeadl
at:
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20071007002942&mode=expanded&
count=26
and it was Gold as you can easily see.

I didn't explain my reasoning because it might have been a spoiler but
now there are two others getting gold, both differing from mine in the
method.

Listen to the song. The two strings are broken and come out as:
100  001 that gives 41 which is A in hex
101  0101 that gives 55 which is U in hex.

Gosh, three ways to make gold.
OpenBSD is Alchemy!

I'd award it gold in the marathon for sure.


From the land "down under": Australia.
Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?