On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:04:15 +0200, ropers wrote:
>On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy  wrote:

quoted text
>> I think it should have been 1000001 instead of 100001.

>

>Gord wrote:

>> Someone is giving it a go:

>> http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027

>

>That's real interesting, guys.

>TheRaven64 writes that (0)100001 1010101 is (caesar-)ciphertext for Au.

>But going with Tom's suggestion of a missing 0, 1000001 1010101 is

>plaintext for AU.

>

>So is Gold the answer or is it "not you"?

>I dunno, but me likey! :)

>

>--ropers

>

Well back on last Sunday I put my guess on undeadl

at:

http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20071007002942&mode=expanded&

count=26

and it was Gold as you can easily see.
I didn't explain my reasoning because it might have been a spoiler but

now there are two others getting gold, both differing from mine in the

method.
Listen to the song. The two strings are broken and come out as:

100  001 that gives 41 which is A in hex

101  0101 that gives 55 which is U in hex.
Gosh, three ways to make gold.

OpenBSD is Alchemy!
I'd award it gold in the marathon for sure.
From the land "down under": Australia.

Do we look  from up over?