Re: 4.2 song

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Tom Van Looy <tom@...>, misc <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 2:04 pm

On 08/10/2007, Tom Van Looy wrote:

Gord wrote:

That's real interesting, guys.
TheRaven64 writes that (0)100001 1010101 is (caesar-)ciphertext for Au.
But going with Tom's suggestion of a missing 0, 1000001 1010101 is
plaintext for AU.

So is Gold the answer or is it "not you"?
I dunno, but me likey! :)

--ropers

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
4.2 song, Theo de Raadt, (Sat Oct 6, 1:55 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Jake Conk, (Mon Oct 8, 8:17 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Gordon Grieder, (Mon Oct 8, 10:33 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Craig Skinner, (Mon Oct 8, 8:27 am)
Re: 4.2 song, ropers, (Mon Oct 8, 11:43 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Todd Alan Smith, (Mon Oct 8, 1:41 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Tom Van Looy, (Mon Oct 8, 12:06 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, ropers, (Mon Oct 8, 2:04 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, RW, (Mon Oct 8, 6:44 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Anton Karpov, (Sun Oct 7, 5:07 am)