Re: 4.2 song

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Tom Van Looy
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 9:06 am

I think it should have been 1000001 instead of 100001. But if it's not 
than it's a good easter egg :-p (and I don't get it).

ropers wrote:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
4.2 song, Theo de Raadt, (Sat Oct 6, 10:55 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Anton Karpov, (Sun Oct 7, 2:07 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Craig Skinner, (Mon Oct 8, 5:27 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Gordon Grieder, (Mon Oct 8, 7:33 am)
Re: 4.2 song, ropers, (Mon Oct 8, 8:43 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Tom Van Looy, (Mon Oct 8, 9:06 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Todd Alan Smith, (Mon Oct 8, 10:41 am)
Re: 4.2 song, ropers, (Mon Oct 8, 11:04 am)
Re: 4.2 song, RW, (Mon Oct 8, 3:44 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Jake Conk, (Mon Oct 8, 5:17 pm)