Re: 4.2 song

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>, ropers <ropers@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 12:06 pm

I think it should have been 1000001 instead of 100001. But if it's not
than it's a good easter egg :-p (and I don't get it).

ropers wrote:

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
4.2 song, Theo de Raadt, (Sat Oct 6, 1:55 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Jake Conk, (Mon Oct 8, 8:17 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Gordon Grieder, (Mon Oct 8, 10:33 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Craig Skinner, (Mon Oct 8, 8:27 am)
Re: 4.2 song, ropers, (Mon Oct 8, 11:43 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Todd Alan Smith, (Mon Oct 8, 1:41 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Tom Van Looy, (Mon Oct 8, 12:06 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, ropers, (Mon Oct 8, 2:04 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, RW, (Mon Oct 8, 6:44 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Anton Karpov, (Sun Oct 7, 5:07 am)