Re: 4.2 song

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Craig Skinner <craig.skinner@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 11:43 am

On 08/10/2007, Craig Skinner wrote:

Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 100001
and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of
ASCII ! and U. But I just don't get it. Is anybody in a mood to
enlighten me?

Cheers,
ropers

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
4.2 song, Theo de Raadt, (Sat Oct 6, 1:55 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Jake Conk, (Mon Oct 8, 8:17 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Gordon Grieder, (Mon Oct 8, 10:33 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Craig Skinner, (Mon Oct 8, 8:27 am)
Re: 4.2 song, ropers, (Mon Oct 8, 11:43 am)
Re: 4.2 song, Todd Alan Smith, (Mon Oct 8, 1:41 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Tom Van Looy, (Mon Oct 8, 12:06 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, ropers, (Mon Oct 8, 2:04 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, RW, (Mon Oct 8, 6:44 pm)
Re: 4.2 song, Anton Karpov, (Sun Oct 7, 5:07 am)