Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez writes:
> Anyways...like Peter said: "it's a bit too late" because the snapshots
If you fetch snapshots as they appear and install them, then at some
point, two times a year, you will be running something very close to
the -release version. When your dmesg output switches to -current
again, you're past that point.
Some of us run snapshots pretty much right away when we notice there's
a new one out (but buy CDs and other gear anyway to support the
project), at least on some systems. If that sounds too scary, your
best option is to order your CDs early and watch errata.html for any
patches. That way you stay with the supported versions as well,
meaning essentially that you have something other people will be able
to test and offer useful suggestions for.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Faik Uygur | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 02/13] syslets: add syslet.h include file, user API/ABI definitions |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: Data corruption issue with splice() on 2.6.27.10 |
| Steven Rostedt | Re: -rt scheduling: wakeup bug? |
