Re: 4.2 song

Previous thread: TPMs in Macbooks on OpenBSD by Nick Guenther on Saturday, October 6, 2007 - 12:17 pm. (4 messages)

Next thread: Re: TPMs in Macbooks on OpenBSD by Richard Storm on Saturday, October 6, 2007 - 2:55 pm. (1 message)
To: <announce@...>, <misc@...>
Subject: 4.2 song
Date: Saturday, October 6, 2007 - 1:55 pm

Just back from my (hiking) trip, I am happy to announce the 4.2
song has been added to the lyrics page at

http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html

Yes, it is designed to sound like a mid-era Rush song, ie. something
from Grace Under Pressure or such. And there's a few easter eggs
hidden in the song as well. It also explains the inside sleeve
image...

To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 8:17 pm

Nothing gets any nerdier than this, O - M - G. *thinks of revenge of the nerds*

To: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@...>
Cc: <announce@...>, <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 10:33 am

On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:55:11AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:

Someone is giving it a go:
http://slashdot.org/~TheRaven64/journal/184027

Gord

To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 8:27 am

Gifts from the "water chicken" no doubt.

As usual, OpenBSD marches to the sound of its own drum :-))

Nice one.

To: Craig Skinner <craig.skinner@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 11:43 am

Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 100001
and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of
ASCII ! and U. But I just don't get it. Is anybody in a mood to
enlighten me?

Cheers,
ropers

To: ropers <ropers@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 1:41 pm

ASCII ! and U.
Merged: !U
As in: Not U
As in: Not you
As in: Not you to us (the seventh to last the line in the song)

That's how I've interpreted it.

To: <misc@...>, ropers <ropers@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 12:06 pm

I think it should have been 1000001 instead of 100001. But if it's not
than it's a good easter egg :-p (and I don't get it).

To: Tom Van Looy <tom@...>, misc <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 2:04 pm

That's real interesting, guys.
TheRaven64 writes that (0)100001 1010101 is (caesar-)ciphertext for Au.
But going with Tom's suggestion of a missing 0, 1000001 1010101 is
plaintext for AU.

So is Gold the answer or is it "not you"?
I dunno, but me likey! :)

--ropers

To: misc <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Monday, October 8, 2007 - 6:44 pm

Well back on last Sunday I put my guess on undeadl
at:
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20071007002942&mode=expanded&
count=26
and it was Gold as you can easily see.

I didn't explain my reasoning because it might have been a spoiler but
now there are two others getting gold, both differing from mine in the
method.

Listen to the song. The two strings are broken and come out as:
100 001 that gives 41 which is A in hex
101 0101 that gives 55 which is U in hex.

Gosh, three ways to make gold.
OpenBSD is Alchemy!

I'd award it gold in the marathon for sure.

From the land "down under": Australia.
Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?

To: OpenBSD <misc@...>
Subject: Re: 4.2 song
Date: Sunday, October 7, 2007 - 5:07 am

Cool! As a big fan of Rush, I like it so much! Artwork is also incredible!
You are the best, guys.

Previous thread: TPMs in Macbooks on OpenBSD by Nick Guenther on Saturday, October 6, 2007 - 12:17 pm. (4 messages)

Next thread: Re: TPMs in Macbooks on OpenBSD by Richard Storm on Saturday, October 6, 2007 - 2:55 pm. (1 message)