Re: pf

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: pf
Date: Saturday, October 6, 2007 - 12:20 am

matheus,

It is the order. The fist queue is for bulk packets and the second is for
ack packets.

Daniel Hartmeier has a detailed page with examples that may make this
clearer.

Prioritizing empty TCP ACKs with pf and ALTQ
http://www.benzedrine.cx/ackpri.html

--
Calomel @ http://calomel.org

On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:36:42AM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
pf, a.padilla, (Thu Oct 4, 11:11 am)
Re: pf, Chad M Stewart, (Thu Oct 4, 5:36 pm)
Re: pf, Andreas Andersson, (Thu Oct 4, 11:25 am)
Re: pf, Roman Strogin, (Thu Oct 4, 11:50 am)
Re: pf, a.padilla, (Fri Oct 5, 8:25 am)
Re: pf, Calomel, (Fri Oct 5, 6:16 pm)
Re: pf, Nenhum_de_Nos, (Fri Oct 5, 11:36 pm)
Re: pf, Stuart Henderson, (Sat Oct 6, 5:16 am)
Re: pf, Calomel, (Sat Oct 6, 12:20 am)
Re: pf, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Thu Oct 4, 11:31 am)