openbsd-misc mailing list

FromSubjectsort iconDate
Unix Fan
Re: Silver River R3.5 Enclosure, IDE/ATA - MBR write failure?

I just caved and bought a new enclosure that actually said USB 1.1 backwards compatible.. and guess what? :)

It works! Hooray!!!! :D

[Copy & Pasted]
umass0: JMicron USB to ATA/ATAPI Bridge, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2
umass0: using SCSI over Bulk-Only
scsibus1 at umass0: 2 targets
sd0 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: <WDC WD25, 00JB-55REA0, 0K20> SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd0: 238475MB, 238475 cyl, 64 head, 32 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 488397168 sec total
....

BTW, just created a partition using OpenBSD 4....

Oct 31, 6:28 pm 2007
Daniel Melameth
pgt prevents pf from scrubbing?

I recently changed my 4.1-stable AP from ral to pgt only to find pf not
scrubbing packets anymore. To make this confusion more simple, I made a
temporary simple pf.conf:

$ sudo cat /etc/pf.conf
external_if = "pppoe0"

set debug loud

scrub in on $external_if all
scrub out on $external_if all max-mss 1452

nat on $external_if from ! $external_if -> ( $external_if )

block in log on $external_if

pass out quick on $external_if inet proto tcp to any
pass out quick on $external_if inet pro...

Oct 31, 2:18 pm 2007
Tobias Weingartner
Re: linux kills laptop hard drive... how does obsd behave?

Unless you set this up yourself, OpenBSD does not do anything like this.
Note, this does not help if the disks come with bogus firmware from the
factory.

-Toby.
--
[100~Plax]sb16i0A2172656B63616820636420726568746F6E61207473754A[dZ1!=b]salax

Oct 31, 1:16 pm 2007
Christian Weisgerber
Re: OpenBSD Sound

Benoit Chesneau has done some promising work on a PulseAudio port,

It's a question of how much work you want to do in the kernel.
Merging audio streams in different formats and sampling rates is a
bit of a pain and I think our audio hackers don't really want to
do resampling in the kernel.

--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de

Oct 31, 12:06 pm 2007
Jacob Meuser
Re: OpenBSD Sound

I've been working on it. libtool issues and crashing (use after
free()) problems are slowing me down. at this point, I'm unsure
whether it's really any better than esound.

OTOH, I've been rather impressed with artsd. recording audio from
radio(4) while listening to streaming mp3s using the same sound card
(in -current of course). is that even possible with esound? kinda

probably not; at least not anytime soon.

something for "newbie hackers" to work on: an ISC licensed audio daemon.

--...

Oct 31, 5:22 pm 2007
Jean-Gérard Pailloncy
etherip lag

Hi,

I have the following setup

In a datacenter:
- a set of racked boxes with IP a.b.c.0/255
- a box as a router R1 with IP a.b.c.21

At work:
- an ADSL connexion with IP x.y.z.91
- a router with a NAT
- a router R2 Soekris with IP 192.168.250.33 (sis0) a.b.c.22 (sis1)
- a iMac connected to the soekris (sis2) with IP a.b.c.23

I manage to have an etherip route between R1 and R2 thru the NAT, with
some parameters in the NAT and correct IPs, bridges config, etc. on both
routers.

Everything...

Oct 31, 11:39 am 2007
Tobias Weingartner
Re: max number of groups

Group accounts with ssh keys controlling access.

--
[100~Plax]sb16i0A2172656B63616820636420726568746F6E61207473754A[dZ1!=b]salax

Oct 31, 12:38 pm 2007
Unix Fan
Re: OpenBSD Sound

This is an interesting topic, I also noticed that multiple applications couldn't open /dev/audio at the same time...

Doesn't this make it impossible to record and listen to audio from ones microphone at the same time? quite... archaic don't you all agree?

Oct 31, 11:49 am 2007
Jacob Meuser
Re: OpenBSD Sound

archaic is the idea that you would need two programs, or that a single
program would need to open /dev/audio twice, for such purpose.

--
jakemsr@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org

Oct 31, 5:41 pm 2007
Alexandre Ratchov
Re: OpenBSD Sound

you don't need to open /dev/audio twice to play and record in
full-duplex. The current audio(4) API allows apps to play and
record simultaneously.

-- Alexandre

Oct 31, 12:42 pm 2007
Theo de Raadt
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

Yes, it is a significant problem that we won't hand-hold whiners who
could by now be digging for things to fix. There are hundreds of ways
to self-motivate, but instead we get whine whine whine.

We've got a PR database with bugs in it, and we NEVER get fixes from
outsiders. That's not news to anyone, if they actually wanted to do
more than whine whine whine.

Hey, don't blame us if many of you guys are lazy whiners.

STOP telling us that we need to do more than we already do.

If you want t...

Oct 31, 11:23 am 2007
Vincent GROSS
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

Okay, so if we're looking for a list of simple tasks to train
ourselves, PR list is a good place.
At least I've learned something today (mandatory whine : why did we
have to wait the 17th post to see this list mentioned ?).

--
Vincent GROSS
"GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and
impossible to accomplish complex actions." --Doug Gwyn (22/Jun/91 in
comp.unix.wizards)

Oct 31, 12:03 pm 2007
Benjamin M. A'Lee
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

Surely the PR list is a fairly obvious place to look for things that need
fixing?

--
Benjamin A'Lee :: benjamin.alee@subvert.org.uk
Subvert Technologies :: http://subvert.org.uk/

Oct 31, 1:32 pm 2007
Nick Guenther
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

For whatever reason, it wasn't.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#Support doesn't mention it, and
the PR list, though linked on the front page, isn't emphasized at all.
But I'm not complaining. This sort of thing is one of those barriers
that keeps out the riffraff who would drag the project down, or
something (whoo partyline).

-Nick

Oct 31, 3:44 pm 2007
Marc Balmer
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

the PR database is quite well visible on the OpenBSD website. It's

Oct 31, 1:36 pm 2007
Theo de Raadt
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

Lists have been made before, by a few developers.

It did not work then, and it won't work now.

Development is not the same process as writing a whiny mail.

Oct 31, 11:25 am 2007
n0g0013
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

On 31.10-09:25, Theo de Raadt wrote:

that is a shame. i can probably better understand the relectance to
re-visit this if it has failed before. perhaps, others are right,
perhaps linux can tolerate it because it's not as good as openbsd.

as for the whining. i'm not. nor am i asking anyone to do anything
they are not happy to do. some communities thrive on communication,
feedback and ideas. i'm new to the openbsd community.

--
t
t
w

Oct 31, 11:41 am 2007
Theo de Raadt
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

On 10/31/07, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote:

> They don't need a list. They could already have started coding. Yet
> we see how few people actually do start coding. Instead, they choose
> to write in english...

How can we get started on the code unless we have some idea of where
to start on the code? Sure we could just code whatever, but why would
we waste time on things that may be useless?

> > Obviously patches will be subject to peer review. Eve...

Oct 31, 10:40 am 2007
ttw+bsd
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

On 31.10-08:40, Theo de Raadt wrote:

and i would suggest that the severe and prevelant attitude toward the
possibilty of poor patches or under-educated actions is the most
significant barrier to encouraging new/young developers.

Oct 31, 11:04 am 2007
Bob Beck
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

No, the severe and prevelent attitude toward the possiblilty of poor
patches or under-educated actions is what makes OpenBSD the most
secure operating system on the planet. It's not perfect but it works.
It is a high stress environment to work in, and guess what, you have
to be prepared to have your work criticized, often brutally. It often
makes the people who must do that criticism look callous, and heck, it's
not fun to do.. This is why we'd prefer people get up to speed on their
own so we have...

Oct 31, 11:26 am 2007
Nick Guenther
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

Well that's the point of it; or at least, a useful side-effect.
Linux can get away with sending fanboi masses at its code because it's
fine with fanboi masses poking at all parts of the kernel, no matter
how secure it may be. Right?

Oct 31, 11:12 am 2007
n0g0013
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

On 31.10-11:12, Nick Guenther wrote:

i think we'll simply agree to disagree. i personally find it quite
disheartening to hear the attitude that prevails here but that's the
community's decision. it certainaly seems to refelect the attitute
of it's leaders (developers).

--
t
t
w

Oct 31, 11:28 am 2007
Michael Small
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

I don't know about that, but the bug list seems to work well around
here. The time I submitted a patch, it was for some dinky little
bug that probably no one would ever hit (who's playing text mode
star trek these days?) but Theo picked it up in a day or two. While
some dinky little bug reports I sent to other less "elitist" projects
have sat out there for years. I can understand, a lot of projects,
free or otherwise, fall into the trap of having to make a low
priority queue and then never being...

Oct 31, 12:31 pm 2007
Dag Richards
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

Consider it the voice of experience (bitter).

Its easy to tell which ones are the programmers.

They write code, then they submit it, it does not suck too much and they
take the suggestions of the current project leads. Then they resubmit
better code.

The rest of us should simply buy CD's, ask and answer the occasional
question, and other wise keep quiet.

When you run a Data Centre, that has thousands of users serving tens of
thousands of customers who need medical services on a 24 hour ...

Oct 31, 12:05 pm 2007
Theo de Raadt
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

There is no community that you speak of.

There are people who write diffs, and people who _don't_ write diffs.

In that sub-group of people who don't write diffs, there are a few who
whine loudly and say we are the reason why. Boo hoo.

If you're not going to write diffs, stop being whiny babies who say
that you don't write diffs because of us.... either step up to the
plate or shut up.

geez, is this kindergarden?

Oct 31, 11:53 am 2007
Tony Abernethy
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

Not yet, despite valiant efforts to the contrary.

CDs shipped today. I might even use 'em.
I do use this list. One of few refuges of sanity.

Oct 31, 1:57 pm 2007
n0g0013
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

On 31.10-09:53, Theo de Raadt wrote:

i do write diffs. i have never suggested that you (or any other
developer on this list) are a motivating factor in that, positive or
negative. the fact that i haven't yet writen an openbsd diffs is a
seperate issue.

quite what all this has to do with whether the janitor list is
productive or not is beyond me. you have stated you don't believe
it is, the only reason the discussion continues is around name
calling.

it is all rather perverse and certaina...

Oct 31, 12:04 pm 2007
Greg Thomas
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

There is a list as pointed out by others.

As evidenced by your ubiquitous emails on the subject, I'll put it
simply: you don't get it, nor will you probably ever get it. An
important theme of OpenBSD is simplicity, in this case that is applied
by simply coding, not adding complexity to the situation by writing
endless emails to a mailing list.

Greg

--
Ticketmaster and Ticketweb suck, but everyone knows that:
http://ticketmastersucks.org
http://lodesertprotosites.org
Dethink to survive ...

Oct 31, 1:54 pm 2007
Pierre-Yves Ritschard
Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors

Instead of doing something useful like reading code, identifying and
trying to fix bugs, you are whining on misc@ asking ``why are you guys
mean and don't tell me what to do'' stop and think about this attitude
for a second, please.

Development is an involved process, it takes a lot of reading and
commitment to get to the point where you're actually able to do
something useful, and no list or misc@ chit-chat will change it.

Oct 31, 11:52 am 2007
Samuel Proulx
OpenBSD Sound

Hello,

I have been using obsd as my primary desktop for a while now and i have a question about the sound system , is there a way to play
two sounds at the same time ? Example watching youtube videos with opera and playing some music in the background with mpd or xmms .
thank you for your time ; )

Oct 31, 9:17 am 2007
Tomas Bodzar
Re: OpenBSD Sound

And still one thing

When I was try OpenBSD (I think that was 3.8),I use WindowMaker,Xmms and lots
of other packages and sound goes well (video together with music and
etc.).Maybe part of dmesg from your system will be useful for somebody of us.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-misc@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-misc@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Samuel Proulx
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:17 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: OpenBSD Sound

Hello,

I have been using obsd as my primary des...

Oct 31, 10:51 am 2007
Brian A Seklecki (Mo...
Re: OpenBSD Sound

Some *BSD systems are adjusting PCM driver support to allow multiple
process to open /dev/dsp / /dev/audio multiple times in-exclusively,
mitigating the needs for piss-poor software API multiplex'ing solutions
a-la ARTS/ESD.

~BAS

Oct 31, 11:06 am 2007
Jacob Meuser
Re: OpenBSD Sound

oh? NetBSD lets /dev/audio be opened non-exclusively, but AFAICS,
there's no real mixing involved. just a hack to let stupid programs
open /dev/audio twice.

piss-poor, artsd? really? have you tried it in -current? I have not
seen any PRs, nor even any comments about artsd. I use it daily. for
both recording and playback.

esd, yeah, piss-poor. or rather, a classic example of everyone and his
brother "contributing". IMO, anyway.

--
jakemsr@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX Sy...

Oct 31, 5:30 pm 2007
Nick Guenther
Re: OpenBSD Sound

On 10/31/07, Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)

Oh awesome! Is /Open/BSD one of those?

-Nick

Oct 31, 11:23 am 2007
Alexandre Ratchov
Re: OpenBSD Sound

no; character devices (such as /dev/audio) keep per-unit state
(encoding, rate, ...). To mix multiple audio streams per-stream
state must be kept. That's why arts/esd/jack/... exist.

-- Alexandre

Oct 31, 12:48 pm 2007
Ted Unangst
Re: OpenBSD Sound

no. but you hit the jackpot!

kernel janitor list:
1. make audio play 2 sounds at once.

see how easy that was?

Oct 31, 12:40 pm 2007
Nick Guenther
Re: OpenBSD Sound

Unix has always been kind of weak in this area. You need a mixer of
some sort to do this. Not /dev/mixer, which controls audio volumes for
the different hardware devices, but a software mixer.
You'll probably want http://ports.openbsd.nu/audio/esound. There's
something called Pulse which is intended as a drop in (but superior)
replacement for esound, and someone () ported it to OpenBSD, but it's
not in the tree yet.
Reading http://www.pulseaudio.org/wiki/PerfectSetup might be
enlightening; it desc...

Oct 31, 10:47 am 2007
Samuel Proulx
Re: OpenBSD Sound

thank for the information . I just tried esound , it worked nice
with mpd.. but it seem that there is no way to make it work with opera ?
I have looked on google and from what i have read im supposed to use
the esddsp program but it didnt come with the esound package ; ( is it
because it incompatible with openbsd ?

Oct 31, 11:11 am 2007
Benjamin M. A'Lee
Re: OpenBSD Sound

Try something like esound or pulseaudio; they run in the background and connect
to your sound card, and opera/xmms/whatever else connect to them instead of
directly to the sound card.

--
Benjamin A'Lee :: benjamin.alee@subvert.org.uk
Subvert Technologies :: http://subvert.org.uk/

Oct 31, 10:19 am 2007
Denis Doroshenko
ath0 degraded in current?

Hi,

yesterday i brought my test notebook to the -current (at the moment it
was somewhere a week back). after that i experience that Atheros WiFi
interface degraded, dhclient does not work since then and if i
configure it by hand the traffic transfer is rather poor (4 KB/s now
vs. 150 KB/s then). Can it be related to source changes to the code
for atheros chips? If any info needed i will provide it.

OpenBSD 4.2-current (GENERIC) #0: Tue Oct 30 09:16:32 EET 2007
cyxob@vll300864.omnitel.lan:/da...

Oct 31, 8:05 am 2007
Reyk Floeter
Re: ath0 degraded in current?

hmmm... thanks.

is it possible for you to try:
- with latest version from HEAD
- with a version from 2007/10/28 (before tx descriptor changes)
- with a version from 2007/10/11 (before channel offset changes)

for the following files:
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5xxx.c
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5xxx.h
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5210.c
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5210reg.h
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5210var.h
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5211.c
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5211reg.h
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5211var.h
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5212.c
src/sys/dev/ic/ar5212reg.h
sr...

Oct 31, 9:18 am 2007
holger glaess
carp ip loadbalancing bug ?

hi

i did the carp ip loadbalancing setup as describe at the man page.

i did it on an full funktional carp cluster that means that carp an pf is ok.

host A:

inet 10.100.0.254 255.255.252.0 10.100.3.255 carpdev em0 vhid 25 pass office2world link0 link1 group lan_if
inet alias 10.100.1.253 255.255.252.0 NONE

inet 10.100.0.254 255.255.252.0 10.100.3.255 carpdev em0 vhid 26 pass office2world advskew 100
inet alias 10.100.1.253 255.255.252.0 NONE

host B:
inet 10.100.0.254 255.255.252.0 10.100...

Oct 31, 6:26 am 2007
Marco Pfatschbacher Oct 31, 1:48 pm 2007
NetOne - Doichin Dokov
Re: carp ip loadbalancing bug ?

CARP loadbalancing by IP requires that your switch sends traffic to the
common CARP IP to BOTH of your machines, otherwise it's not gonna work
as assumed. ARP loadbalancing does not require this, but there's no
other way to achieve this when you want to use IP loadbalancing.

Oct 31, 12:46 pm 2007
Daniel Melameth
Troubleshooting hostap and ral (and pgt)

Leveraging OpenBSD for hostap at home, in the past the wi driver and related
hardware was rock solid and I never had an issue. I've since moved to
802.11g using ral, but I've had issues with it. Most notably, every couple
of weeks, or sometimes every couple of days, the ral card stops accepting
packets and I cannot get any system to associate with it. An ifconfig down
and up on the ral card gets things working again, but the issue seems to
quickly return shortly thereafter and sometimes a reboot is...

Oct 31, 4:11 am 2007
Unix Fan
Re: Silver River R3.5 Enclosure, IDE/ATA - MBR write failure?

Yes, I'm obviously using the included power adapter.. it doesn't even show up without that ;)...

I just received a response from tech support, They claim it does support USB 1.1.. I don't understand the reasons for the errors, perhaps I'll seek another enclosure that explicitly mentions such backwards compatibility..

This sucks.... big time.. :(

Oct 31, 3:14 am 2007
Sainsbury\'s Bank
login failures

Contact Sainsbury's Bank Online

Customer Care IdentificationPlus

In an effort to protect your Sainsbury's Bank Online security protection
does not recognize you at this computer for one of the following reasons.

Although we cannot disclose our investigative procedures that led to this
conclusion, Please know that we took this action in order to maintain the
safety of your account :

* As a result of too many incorrect attempts to access and Login
failures.

* Change in IP address an...

Oct 30, 11:44 pm 2007
Girish Venkatachalam
Debugging a CD/DVD driver?

Hello friends,

I am having a great deal of handicap with OpenBSD since I am unable to
use/access my SATA DVD drives. The machine would freeze and do nothing
till I reboot. ( I am running 4.0, it used to sometimes work with an old
installation)

Here is the excerpt from dmesg.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: <SONY, DVD RW AW-G170S, 1.72> SCSI0 5/cdrom
removab
le
cd0(pciide1:0:1): using PIO mode 4

<<&l...

Oct 30, 9:35 pm 2007
Nick Holland
Re: Debugging a CD/DVD driver?

No, you NEED to upgrade to 4.2. 4.0 is going out of support in two days.
Upgrades have to be a part of your life. You should be at 4.1 now, your
problems may no longer exist. Even before you say "I have a problem",

step 1: run the newest code, see if someone long ago fixed it.

No one wants to see a patch against 4.0.

Few even want to see a patch against 4.2 (only wackos that like to see
"-stable" on the end of their Frankenstein systems).
Developers are past that now, they are working on...

Oct 30, 11:22 pm 2007
Unix Fan
Re: Silver River R3.5 Enclosure, IDE/ATA - MBR write failure?

Edit, I tried using the latest snapshot bsd.rd and the device is still detected.. but the same error occurs..

I know it's "trying" to write, each time I print q in the fdisk interface.. the disk status light flickers.. could the device just hate non-USB 2.0 controllers?

(Crap, It seems to work perfectly fine on a system running Windows 2000.. With a USB 2.0 controller.. *Sigh*)

Do I need a new enclosure?

Oct 30, 8:37 pm 2007
previous daytodaynext day
NoneOctober 31, 2007None