> On 31.10-11:12, Nick Guenther wrote:
quoted text
> [ ... ]
> > > and i would suggest that the severe and prevelant attitude toward the
> > > possibilty of poor patches or under-educated actions is the most
> > > significant barrier to encouraging new/young developers.
> > 
> > Well that's the point of it; or at least, a useful side-effect.
> > Linux can get away with sending fanboi masses at its code because it's
> > fine with fanboi masses poking at all parts of the kernel, no matter
> > how secure it may be. Right?
> 
> i think we'll simply agree to disagree.  i personally find it quite
> disheartening to hear the attitude that prevails here but that's the
> community's decision.  it certainaly seems to refelect the attitute
> of it's leaders (developers).

There is no community that you speak of.

There are people who write diffs, and people who _don't_ write diffs.

In that sub-group of people who don't write diffs, there are a few who
whine loudly and say we are the reason why.  Boo hoo.

If you're not going to write diffs, stop being whiny babies who say
that you don't write diffs because of us....  either step up to the
plate or shut up.

geez, is this kindergarden?