hi
i did the carp ip loadbalancing setup as describe at the man page.
i did it on an full funktional carp cluster that means that carp an pf is ok.
host A:
inet 10.100.0.254 255.255.252.0 10.100.3.255 carpdev em0 vhid 25 pass office2world link0 link1 group lan_if
inet alias 10.100.1.253 255.255.252.0 NONEinet 10.100.0.254 255.255.252.0 10.100.3.255 carpdev em0 vhid 26 pass office2world advskew 100
inet alias 10.100.1.253 255.255.252.0 NONEhost B:
inet 10.100.0.254 255.255.252.0 10.100.3.255 carpdev em0 vhid 25 pass office2world advskew 100 link0 link1 group lan_if
inet alias 10.100.1.253 255.255.252.0 NONEinet 10.100.0.254 255.255.252.0 10.100.3.255 carpdev em0 vhid 26 pass office2world
inet alias 10.100.1.253 255.255.252.0 NONEafter the changes some host are not able to reach the default gw 10.100.0.254 and some works fine.
i test this with my own system ( one freebsd , one linux ) both on the same switch / segment.the freebsd system have 10.100.1.82 as ip the linux have 10.100.2.155 (by dhcp )
the freebsd works the linux don't .
is there an known issue ? maybee that carp ip loadblancing have problems with /22 networks ?
holger.
ps. sorry for my ugly english
| James Bruce | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Peter Zijlstra | [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| Rick Jones | Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
