Re: Odd msdos fs behaviour [was: Re: Odd FFS behavior]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Vasek <vasek@...>
Cc: Edd Barrett <vext01@...>, OpenBSD <misc@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 3:24 pm

On 25/10/2007, David Vasek wrote:

Be VERY careful with LFN support and 8.3 filenames. MS' implementation
of LFN support is broken by design, because the short filenames are
not saved along with the long ones and instead are autogenerated from
the long ones -- which, if you have a set of similarly named files
with long filenames can easily result in a 8.3 filename referring to a
different file after you delete and copy.

See the section "Ambiguous LFNs" here:
http://users.iafrica.com/c/cq/cquirke/lfns.htm

The upshot is, you're best off avoiding these older 8.3 FAT file
systems altogether.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Odd FFS behavior, Edd Barrett, (Mon Oct 22, 3:45 am)
Re: Odd FFS behavior, Edd Barrett, (Thu Oct 25, 3:52 am)
Re: Odd FFS behavior, Lars Hansson, (Thu Oct 25, 6:30 am)
Re: Odd FFS behavior, Edd Barrett, (Thu Oct 25, 8:06 am)
Odd msdos fs behaviour [was: Re: Odd FFS behavior], David Vasek, (Thu Oct 25, 4:57 am)
Re: Odd msdos fs behaviour [was: Re: Odd FFS behavior], ropers, (Tue Oct 30, 3:24 pm)
Re: Odd FFS behavior , Aaron W. Hsu, (Mon Oct 22, 12:49 pm)
Re: Odd FFS behavior, Otto Moerbeek, (Mon Oct 22, 4:14 am)
Re: Odd FFS behavior, Edd Barrett, (Mon Oct 22, 5:14 am)
Re: Odd FFS behavior, Otto Moerbeek, (Mon Oct 22, 5:46 am)
Re: Odd FFS behavior, David Vasek, (Mon Oct 22, 6:26 am)
Re: Odd FFS behavior, Denise H. G., (Mon Oct 22, 6:47 am)