login
Header Space

 
 

Re: Non-x86

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: Non-x86
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 2:26 pm

> >> Where are the choices for non-x86?

I agree that sparc64 is currently the best alternative to the x86 
architecture in i386 and amd64.  For me, the biggest obstacles to 
buying a sparc64 machine are:

 * sparc64 machines the are significantly more expensive than their x86 
counterparts.

 * There is no binary emulator that would allow me to run proprietary 
software like Mathematica on sparc64.  (In contrast, I can run Mathematica 
on i386 with the Linux binary emulator.)

NetBSD has a Solaris binary emulator for sparc64, so with a little work it 
might be possible to remove this second obstacle.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Mon Oct 22, 4:05 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Nick Guenther, (Mon Oct 22, 3:11 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Jeff Quast, (Mon Oct 22, 6:07 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Luca Corti, (Tue Oct 23, 4:03 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Ben Goren, (Tue Oct 23, 11:35 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Douglas A. Tutty, (Wed Oct 24, 9:58 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. , Theo de Raadt, (Tue Oct 23, 9:14 pm)
Re: Non-x86, Lars Noodén, (Fri Oct 26, 3:54 am)
Re: Non-x86, Ted Unangst, (Fri Oct 26, 11:28 am)
Re: Non-x86, Lars Noodén, (Fri Oct 26, 12:17 pm)
Re: Non-x86, Martin Schröder, (Fri Oct 26, 12:23 pm)
Re: Non-x86, Lars Noodén, (Mon Oct 29, 12:53 pm)
Re: Non-x86, Matthew Szudzik, (Tue Oct 30, 2:26 pm)
Re: Non-x86, Douglas A. Tutty, (Mon Oct 29, 5:47 pm)
Re: Non-x86, Matthew Szudzik, (Fri Oct 26, 5:03 pm)
Re: Non-x86, Jeff Quast, (Sun Oct 28, 9:59 am)
Re: Non-x86, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sun Oct 28, 11:27 am)
Re: Non-x86, Martin Schröder, (Fri Oct 26, 7:39 am)
Re: Non-x86, mickey, (Fri Oct 26, 7:49 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Adam Getchell, (Wed Oct 24, 1:41 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Wed Oct 24, 9:38 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Chris Kuethe, (Wed Oct 24, 10:14 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Christoph Egger, (Wed Oct 24, 11:10 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Artur Grabowski, (Wed Oct 24, 11:25 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Christoph Egger, (Wed Oct 24, 11:33 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Wed Oct 24, 11:45 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Wed Oct 24, 10:20 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. , Damien Miller, (Tue Oct 23, 9:25 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .. , Carlo Gebhardt, (Fri Oct 26, 6:58 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Per-Erik Persson, (Tue Oct 23, 5:00 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Ted Unangst, (Tue Oct 23, 12:39 pm)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Lars Hansson, (Tue Oct 23, 6:56 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Lars Noodén, (Tue Oct 23, 6:45 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., carlopmart, (Tue Oct 23, 3:07 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Henning Brauer, (Tue Oct 23, 8:19 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Christoph Egger, (Wed Oct 24, 11:09 am)
Re: About Xen: maybe a reiterative question but .., Ted Unangst, (Wed Oct 24, 2:09 pm)
speck-geostationary