> >> Where are the choices for non-x86?
I agree that sparc64 is currently the best alternative to the x86
architecture in i386 and amd64. For me, the biggest obstacles to
buying a sparc64 machine are:
* sparc64 machines the are significantly more expensive than their x86
counterparts.
* There is no binary emulator that would allow me to run proprietary
software like Mathematica on sparc64. (In contrast, I can run Mathematica
on i386 with the Linux binary emulator.)
NetBSD has a Solaris binary emulator for sparc64, so with a little work it
might be possible to remove this second obstacle.
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Lennert Buytenhek | [PATCH 16/39] mv643xx_eth: get rid of ETH_/ethernet_/eth_ prefixes |
