Re: carp on wan interface

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Cc: Claudio Jeker <cjeker@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 8:03 am

* Claudio Jeker [2007-10-30 12:28]:

I actually have one that works OK, a RAD STM-1 to FastEthernet
converter... but the management interface sucks big time :)

but in general, I totally agree with claudio here. they often cause
issues. and if it is only the missing link state forwarding (why can't
the box take down the ethernet link when the wan link fails, at least
as an option?). So your best bet is to terminate wans directly on
OpenBSD boxes. And then you still want ethernet where possible. And if
you spec Ethernet, you often get "something" with carrier-provided
converters, or MPLS tunnels that happily keep the ethernet link up on
both sides even if the connection is gone somewhere in between, or ...

in the end, you have to be very careful in finding good wan links.

and we need to implement udld or the like.

--
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
carp on wan interface, Aaron, (Mon Oct 29, 11:27 pm)
Re: carp on wan interface, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Oct 30, 5:28 am)
Re: carp on wan interface, Aaron, (Tue Oct 30, 7:05 am)
Re: carp on wan interface, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Oct 30, 7:33 am)
Re: carp on wan interface, Aaron P. Martinez, (Tue Oct 30, 12:13 pm)
Re: carp on wan interface, Jon Radel, (Tue Oct 30, 10:38 am)
Re: carp on wan interface, Claudio Jeker, (Tue Oct 30, 7:21 am)
Re: carp on wan interface, Henning Brauer, (Tue Oct 30, 8:03 am)
Re: carp on wan interface, Henning Brauer, (Tue Oct 30, 5:20 am)