On 10/30/07, Henning Brauer  wrote:

quoted text
>

> * Tony Sarendal  [2007-10-30 11:25]:

> > On 10/30/07, Henning Brauer  wrote:

> > >

> > > * Tony Sarendal  [2007-10-30 02:28]:

> > > > bgp rib and fib look out of sync.

> > > > Any ideas why it behaves this way ?

> > > >

> > > > It seems like the networks that only exist in bgp fail to re-route

> when

> > > I

> > > > take

> > > > down a core router that is the current bgp-nexthop.

> > >

> > > lookslike there is a case we miss listening to the routing socket, or

> > > there is sth in the message that makes us skip it.

> > > can you run "route monitor" on the misbehaving machine while causing

> > > the change and send me the output (no need to spam the list with that

> > > tho)?

> >

> >

> >

> > Will do.

> >

> > So running a setup where ospfd and bgpd carries the same prefixes should

> > work ?

>

> oh. the same ones. that is a bit iffy right now.

That was the answer I was looking for =)
No worries, I will adapt the live design I'm implementing as I want it

working

well on 4.2. I can either make sure ospfd and bgpd and don't carry the same

prefixes, which is possibly in this particulare case, or I can go bgp-only.

I'm most likely going bgp-only, hot-potato routing is something I want.
If there is any testing I can do to assist please let me know,

otherwise I'll just continue to play with it. It is my form of mediation

to clear my mind from work.
/Tony