Re: using bgpd and ospfd

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Tony Sarendal <tony@...>
Cc: misc <misc@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 - 6:31 am

On 2007/10/30 10:17, Tony Sarendal wrote:

I had problems with this, I think bgpd was stomping on the ospf route
of my IX's /24, causing the routes from peers to fail nexthop validation
on the other routers. I didn't get to the bottom of it so I just started
filtering that /24 in bgpd but I don't think it's meant to do that.

The routing table doesn't handle multiple routes with differing
priorities, so the daemons must watch for updates on the routing socket
and react to them, I guess this is somewhat delicate but I don't have
a diff so I'll shut up (-:

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
using bgpd and ospfd, Tony Sarendal, (Mon Oct 29, 9:19 pm)
Re: using bgpd and ospfd, Henning Brauer, (Tue Oct 30, 5:16 am)
Re: using bgpd and ospfd, Tony Sarendal, (Tue Oct 30, 6:17 am)
Re: using bgpd and ospfd, Henning Brauer, (Tue Oct 30, 6:50 am)
Re: using bgpd and ospfd, Tony Sarendal, (Tue Oct 30, 7:09 am)
Re: using bgpd and ospfd, Stuart Henderson, (Tue Oct 30, 6:31 am)