On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 09:55:13AM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:

quoted text
> On 10/25/07, Douglas A. Tutty  wrote:

> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:

> > > Well, there is no solution.  16 was chosen a lot of years ago as a

> > > reasonable amount of state to carry around, and that's the standard

> > > and we're probably going to stick with it.

> >

> > What, then, is the correct way to separate the project files of more

> > than 16 projects, where some users will need access to all of the

> > groups?

>

> read again:  there is no solution.

> 

There has to be _some_ solution but it doesn't have to revolve around

groups.  Surely we don't need a separate box for every 16 projects (and

lets not get into another reason to use Xen :)) )
Perhaps it putting the project files in CVS for individuals to check

out.  Perhaps its some database system.  I don't know.  I am confident

that there is a logical proper solution.
Doug.