On 10/25/07, Douglas A. Tutty  wrote:

quoted text
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:

> > Well, there is no solution.  16 was chosen a lot of years ago as a

> > reasonable amount of state to carry around, and that's the standard

> > and we're probably going to stick with it.

>

> What, then, is the correct way to separate the project files of more

> than 16 projects, where some users will need access to all of the

> groups?

read again:  there is no solution.