On 25/10/2007, at 8:28 PM, Richard Toohey wrote:
> My analogies usually go to custard, but I'll try this one.
(Oops, sorry about not removing the irrelevant stuff from that post.)
And - just to extend the analogy further - the risks may not be
malicious. So if any of the above scenarios the risks would also be
accidental - car crashes, driver has heart attack, plane falls from
sky, etc. Something outside your control. Obviously for number 1 -
one accident does not wipe you out.
And one other extension - number 3 - the beefed up car - perhaps one
of the modifications goes wrong (so again, not a malicious attack) -
the engine overheats because of the extra weight, catches fire, and
your other mods mean that they're all locked in. The glue from the
partitions is toxic and they are overcome by fumes. Whatever. One
accident wipes you out completely.
Enough!
| Andreas Gruenbacher | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Alan Cox | Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Jens Axboe | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
| Paul E. McKenney | Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures |
git: | |
| KOSAKI Motohiro | [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Alexey Dobriyan | [PATCH 09/33] netns ct: per-netns /proc/net/nf_conntrack, /proc/net/stat/nf_conntr... |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
