On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:20 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Darrin Chandler wrote:

quoted text
>

>> Looking at what you've written, you seem to consider OpenBSD to be

>> pretty secure. By extension, let's assume the developers, and Theo in

>> particular, have some darned good knowledge about security and some

>> priorities in that regard. Then, when Theo and developers (and

>> others in

>> this community) weigh in and tell you that virtualization is not more

>> secure, but less, you continue and continue.

>>

> Well, since a lot of people on this list like to continue diverting

> the

> discussion way out in space with far reaching, unrelated tangential

> arguments, I can only say that this discussion has descend well

> below any

> level of utilization.

You apparently missed my post.  Allow me to re-summarize the situation.
There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having

it *more secure* than not having it at all.
Is that direct enough for you?
---

Jason Dixon

DixonGroup Consulting

http://www.dixongroup.net