Huh? What does that have to do with the number of known exploits for aOn Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jeremy Huiskamp wrote:
> On 24-Oct-07, at 5:59 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
A simple measure of an OS 'security' is the simple metrics of known
exploits that have been identified.
Certainly OBSD ranks high on the list, which is one reason why we're here.
Certailny good developers are important and appreciated.
The fact that Microshaft crap has hundreds or thousands of vulnerabilities
is the other extreme of the list.
> That's counter-intuitive. If I'm looking for security, I'd rather
Lee
================================================
Leland V. Lammert lvl@omnitec.net
Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
Network/Internet Consultants www.omnitec.net
================================================
| Andreas Gruenbacher | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Alan Cox | Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Jens Axboe | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
| Paul E. McKenney | Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures |
git: | |
| KOSAKI Motohiro | [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Alexey Dobriyan | [PATCH 09/33] netns ct: per-netns /proc/net/nf_conntrack, /proc/net/stat/nf_conntr... |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
