Agreed!On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:44:37PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> Looking at what you've written, you seem to consider OpenBSD to be
So far, nobody has bother to substiante the argument against the
hypothesis, so the past 50 posts or so have just been entertainment.
> As someone who doesn't know a great deal about virtualization, I can
> As someone who reads this list and would like to know more about
Lee
==============================================
Leland V. Lammert lvl@omnitec.net
Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
Network/Internet Consultants www.omnitec.net
================================================
| Andreas Gruenbacher | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| Alan Cox | Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Jens Axboe | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
| Paul E. McKenney | Re: [PATCH 0/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently across all architectures |
git: | |
| KOSAKI Motohiro | [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Alexey Dobriyan | [PATCH 09/33] netns ct: per-netns /proc/net/nf_conntrack, /proc/net/stat/nf_conntr... |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
