Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Combination?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 - 3:16 pm

* Paul de Weerd [2007-10-24 19:28]:

rdate can use adjtime, so that point is moot.

> Another issue is the fact that the server you're syncing to may not be

this is the key. rdate sets/skews the clock based on a single reply.
which might get affected badly by network issues or whatever, or be
spoofed, or... ntpd doesn't have that problem at all - last not least it
never uses less than 8 packets to form a single update (just picking
that one as example, there is more it can do, because it can develop
thing over TIME instead of a single one-shot update & exit.

and it fixes the clock frequency permanently using adjtick. rdate
doesn't.

> And it's totally unneccessary, simply run ntpd and be done

exactly.

--
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Co..., Henning Brauer, (Wed Oct 24, 3:16 pm)
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Co..., Pierre-Yves Ritschard, (Tue Oct 23, 12:39 pm)