Christoph Egger wrote:
quoted text
> On Wednesday 24 October 2007 17:25:25 Artur Grabowski wrote:
>> Christoph Egger <Christoph_Egger@gmx.de> writes:
>>>> So I'm going to guess the answer is "No, integrating xen
>>>> paravirtualization is not a project priority at this time. Also, where
>>>> are your diffs?"
>>> The OpenBSD/Xen source is at http://hg.recoil.org/openbsd-xen-sys.hg
>>> Unfortunately, Anil has troubles with the availability of the server.
>>>
>>> I rely on having a willing OpenBSD developer who commits the patches I
>>> send to him. But as long as there is none, it doesn't go in.
>> I'm willing to stretch as far as saying: This might be interesting for
>> some testing purposes for kernel hackers if Xen could be hosted on
>> OpenBSD.
>>
>> But this doesn't mean that I'm even close to volunteering doing the
>> job. It just would be cool to have if it doesn't break stuff.
>>
>> //art
> 
> Actually it is good to find NULL-pointer (mostly use-after-free) bugs,
> that are hard to find on real hardware.
> Believe me or not: OpenBSD has tons of them.
> 
> Christoph
>

Christoph,

  One question about your Xen port: is it possible to compile a xen 
para-virtualized openbsd kernel to launch a clean OpenBSD 4.1 or 4.2 install??

Thanks for your great job Christoph.



-- 
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com