Christoph Egger wrote:

quoted text
> On Wednesday 24 October 2007 17:25:25 Artur Grabowski wrote:

>> Christoph Egger  writes:

>>>> So I'm going to guess the answer is "No, integrating xen

>>>> paravirtualization is not a project priority at this time. Also, where

>>>> are your diffs?"

>>> The OpenBSD/Xen source is at http://hg.recoil.org/openbsd-xen-sys.hg

>>> Unfortunately, Anil has troubles with the availability of the server.

>>>

>>> I rely on having a willing OpenBSD developer who commits the patches I

>>> send to him. But as long as there is none, it doesn't go in.

>> I'm willing to stretch as far as saying: This might be interesting for

>> some testing purposes for kernel hackers if Xen could be hosted on

>> OpenBSD.

>>

>> But this doesn't mean that I'm even close to volunteering doing the

>> job. It just would be cool to have if it doesn't break stuff.

>>

>> //art

>

> Actually it is good to find NULL-pointer (mostly use-after-free) bugs,

> that are hard to find on real hardware.

> Believe me or not: OpenBSD has tons of them.

>

> Christoph

>

Christoph,
  One question about your Xen port: is it possible to compile a xen

para-virtualized openbsd kernel to launch a clean OpenBSD 4.1 or 4.2 install??
Thanks for your great job Christoph.
--

CL Martinez

carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com