On 10/24/07, carlopmart wrote:
Not unless someone actually writes the code to do it. Notice the
extreme number of people with openbsd.org email addresses jumping up
and down, volunteering to do it (hint: none). Possibly not even if
someone writes the code. Diffs are not always merged. They should be
good diffs that improve OpenBSD. Notice the number of people with
openbsd.org email addresses who are not convinced that doing this a)
will improve OpenBSD and b) won't actually hurt.
So I'm going to guess the answer is "No, integrating xen
paravirtualization is not a project priority at this time. Also, where
are your diffs?"
CK
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
| James Bottomley | Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree |
| Andrew Morton | Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa... |
| Randy Dunlap | Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 (paravirt/vsmp/no PCI) |
| Arnd Hannemann | 2.6.24-rc8 hangs at mfgpt-timer |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Joseph R. Pannon | More install questions |
| Paul Richards | Header files |
| Les Andrzejewski | X386/WD90C31/SUMSUNG SYNC MASTER 4 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
