Hello Pierre-Yves,
Tuesday, October 23, 2007, 11:39:10 AM, you wrote:
>> You don't really need ntpd on all systems. One (timeserver)
PYR> I hope nobody takes what you say seriously. Running rdate instead of
PYR> ntpd like you describe is wrong for many reasons which have been stated
PYR> over and over in the last few years. Please do not spread wrong
PYR> information around, and do your homework before giving others advice
PYR> on what you think is good sysadmin practice.
The ntpd from OBSD is raw and lame yet. It takes days (!) to really
synchronize, adjusting time and clock frequency back and forth (even if you
start with -s) so it's too early to say that using it is "right". It will
be "right" after it matures, gets more useful synchronization algorithm and
it's own ntpdate (or a parameter to synchronize and exit).
--
Best regards,
Boris mailto:boris@twopoint.com
| Justin C. Sherrill | Re: pkgsrc bulk build and tiff |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Ingo Molnar | [crash, bisected] Kernel BUG at ffffffff8079afb1 (__netif_schedule()) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: tbench wrt. loopback TSO |
