Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Combination?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: OpenBSD-misc list <misc@...>
Cc: Boris Goldberg <boris@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 12:31 pm

On 10/23/07, Boris Goldberg wrote:

That sort of remark has often started endless debates. :)

For me, trusting rdate to provide time or using ntpd for it is pretty
much the same, but feel free to disagree. There are no risk-free
activities.

In my book, ntpd gets the job done with less administrative work and
it's made by the same people I trust to provide me with a sensible and
secure system.

> Talking about a "more work"

If using site.tgz this sort of thing is rather a moot point.

> Anyway, for the last five years no version of OBSD (including 4.2) worked for

If you haven't already, it might be wise to track the issue and report
it. Most of my things requiring post-install kernel config got fixed
over the next release, so I'm a happy camper.

Cheers,

Rogier

--
If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Co..., Pierre-Yves Ritschard, (Tue Oct 23, 12:39 pm)
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Co..., Rogier Krieger, (Tue Oct 23, 12:31 pm)