Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Combination?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rogier Krieger
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 9:31 am

On 10/23/07, Boris Goldberg <boris@twopoint.com> wrote:

That sort of remark has often started endless debates. :)

For me, trusting rdate to provide time or using ntpd for it is pretty
much the same, but feel free to disagree. There are no risk-free
activities.

In my book, ntpd gets the job done with less administrative work and
it's made by the same people I trust to provide me with a sensible and
secure system.



If using site.tgz this sort of thing is rather a moot point.



If you haven't already, it might be wise to track the issue and report
it. Most of my things requiring post-install kernel config got fixed
over the next release, so I'm a happy camper.

Cheers,

Rogier

-- 
If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a ..., Rogier Krieger, (Tue Oct 23, 9:31 am)
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a ..., Pierre-Yves Ritschard, (Tue Oct 23, 9:39 am)
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a ..., Darrin Chandler, (Tue Oct 23, 11:59 am)
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a ..., Martin Schröder, (Tue Oct 23, 3:44 pm)