Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Combination?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 10:46 am

* Boris Goldberg [2007-10-23 15:50]:

that is bad advice.
it is not only much more work to set up, it also doesn't remotely yield
the same results. ntpd is much much better, since it doesn't rely on a
single answer from soem server to set the clock, and because it adjusts
the clock frequency over time.
there is not much point in using rdate at all.

--
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Co..., Henning Brauer, (Tue Oct 23, 10:46 am)
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Co..., Pierre-Yves Ritschard, (Tue Oct 23, 12:39 pm)