Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a Combination?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rogier Krieger
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 7:01 am

On 10/23/07, Boris Goldberg <boris@twopoint.com> wrote:

While your suggestion would work, it would also entail more work
without adding benefit. Upon install, you get the question of whether
you want to use ntpd. Starting with 4.2, it even asks for a specific
NTP server.

Using ntpd gets you better synchronisation without the need of setting
something up with cron. Rdate will work, but the work developers put
into (further integrating) ntpd makes rdate appear rather ...
outdated.

Cheers,

Rogier

-- 
If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a ..., Rogier Krieger, (Tue Oct 23, 7:01 am)
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a ..., Pierre-Yves Ritschard, (Tue Oct 23, 9:39 am)
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a ..., Darrin Chandler, (Tue Oct 23, 11:59 am)
Re: Network Time Synchronization using timed or ntpd or a ..., Martin Schröder, (Tue Oct 23, 3:44 pm)