Per-Erik Persson wrote:
Virtualization is available already. See the package qemu.
http://www.openbsd.org/4.1_packages/
Or are you aiming for Xen specifically?
Keep in mind that the most significant opponent to OpenBSD has now
influence if not control over Xen:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/18/ms_xen_partner/
Xen's developer and management time will be burned up with no result.
No business that I am aware of has yet survived such a "partnership"
It'd be a first if XenSource were to break the record.
-Lars
| James Bottomley | Breakage caused by unreviewed patch in x86 tree |
| Andrew Morton | Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa... |
| Randy Dunlap | Re: 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 (paravirt/vsmp/no PCI) |
| Arnd Hannemann | 2.6.24-rc8 hangs at mfgpt-timer |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Joseph R. Pannon | More install questions |
| Paul Richards | Header files |
| Les Andrzejewski | X386/WD90C31/SUMSUNG SYNC MASTER 4 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
