Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2007 » October » 17

Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@...>
To: Joachim Schipper <j.schipper@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies)
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - 3:28 pm

> Unless I am sorely mistaken, systrace can be broken by any user with


Well, then you are sorely mistaken.  One of your processes can break

the other one.  What's the big deal.  Where's the priviledge

escalation?  There is none.


You overstate the situation.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
systrace/stsh policies, Xavier Mertens, (Thu Oct 11, 2:54 pm)
Re: systrace/stsh policies, Joachim Schipper, (Thu Oct 11, 6:05 pm)
hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Aaron, (Sun Oct 14, 4:27 pm)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Aaron, (Mon Oct 15, 10:30 pm)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Joachim Schipper, (Wed Oct 17, 3:15 pm)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies) , Theo de Raadt, (Wed Oct 17, 3:28 pm)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Joachim Schipper, (Mon Oct 15, 4:10 pm)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Francesco Toscan, (Mon Oct 15, 2:31 am)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Steve Shockley, (Sun Oct 14, 11:40 pm)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Ted Unangst, (Mon Oct 15, 1:54 pm)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Eduardo Tongson, (Mon Oct 15, 2:32 am)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Janne Johansson, (Mon Oct 15, 11:46 am)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Nick Guenther, (Mon Oct 15, 11:37 am)
Re: hardening BSD (was systrace/stsh policies), Darren Spruell, (Sun Oct 14, 5:07 pm)