Re: OpenBSD current: XF4 or xenocara?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Martin Toft
Date: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 - 2:12 pm

On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 11:16:18PM +0200, Martin Toft wrote:

For the archives: release(8) answers my question. It appears to be the
most up-to-date building documentation.

Martin

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
OpenBSD current: XF4 or xenocara?, Martin Toft, (Sun Oct 14, 2:16 pm)
Re: OpenBSD current: XF4 or xenocara?, Antti Harri, (Sun Oct 14, 2:28 pm)
Re: OpenBSD current: XF4 or xenocara?, Martin Toft, (Sun Oct 14, 2:30 pm)
Re: OpenBSD current: XF4 or xenocara?, Juan Miscaro, (Sun Oct 14, 2:37 pm)
Re: OpenBSD current: XF4 or xenocara?, Martin Toft, (Sun Oct 14, 2:52 pm)
Re: OpenBSD current: XF4 or xenocara?, Martin Toft, (Tue Oct 16, 2:12 pm)