On 10/14/07, Bryan Irvine wrote:
I must admit I was impressed that he was big enough to apologize for it.
> Just let them shift it to a private correspondence where it belongs.
I'm kind of curious. Google does have a history of employing people
simply give them a paycheck. And weren't they one of the ones who
kicked in $10k when it was needed? I know the heads of python and
samba are both employed at Google. From an independence point of
view, I know Theo has demonstrated that he will be independent, but
what are the implications of him getting a paycheck, and being told to
work 100% on openbsd? I find that interesting.
And when I visited the campus, I saw a number of openbsd t-shirt wearing geeks.
--
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity."
-- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. |
| Christoph Lameter | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
git: | |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [PATCH 06/32] IGET: Mark iget() and read_inode() as being obsolete [try #2] |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
