Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paul de Weerd
Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - 12:01 pm

On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:34:48PM -0500, Robert C Wittig wrote:
| If you had to choose between, say, 2 gig RAM and a 32 bit CPU, or 1 gig
| RAM and a 64 bit CPU, which would be a better choice, in general?

There is no such generalization. The amount of RAM you need depends on
the task. For firewalling, you don't need lots. For a high-traffic,
caching webserver you do need much.

If, in general, you are firewalling .. you won't need much RAM. If, in
general, you are doing something else, you might need it. Like I said
in my previous mail, there is no short answer. No quick solution.
Everything has advantages and disadvantages. In some cases you may not
even want to run OpenBSD (*shock* !).

In general, you should look at the specific problem at hand and solve
it with the means available.

Cheers,

Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

--
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
                 http://www.weirdnet.nl/

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Florin Andrei, (Thu Oct 4, 5:48 pm)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Stuart Henderson, (Fri Oct 5, 1:31 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Claudio Jeker, (Sun Oct 7, 12:15 pm)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Florin Andrei, (Mon Oct 8, 10:41 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Florin Andrei, (Mon Oct 8, 10:59 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, knitti, (Mon Oct 8, 1:49 pm)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Florin Andrei, (Mon Oct 8, 5:28 pm)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Karsten McMinn, (Mon Oct 8, 6:05 pm)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Henning Brauer, (Tue Oct 9, 4:32 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Florin Andrei, (Tue Oct 9, 9:07 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Florin Andrei, (Tue Oct 9, 9:27 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Henning Brauer, (Tue Oct 9, 11:03 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Florin Andrei, (Tue Oct 9, 1:49 pm)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Henning Brauer, (Wed Oct 10, 12:35 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Siju George, (Wed Oct 10, 6:04 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Henning Brauer, (Wed Oct 10, 6:15 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Wed Oct 10, 6:35 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Scott Wells, (Wed Oct 10, 7:01 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Robert C Wittig, (Wed Oct 10, 7:24 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Paul de Weerd, (Wed Oct 10, 7:41 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Jon Radel, (Wed Oct 10, 7:47 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Tony Abernethy, (Wed Oct 10, 7:59 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Siju George, (Wed Oct 10, 8:23 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Tony Abernethy, (Wed Oct 10, 9:20 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Stuart Henderson, (Wed Oct 10, 10:04 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Robert C Wittig, (Wed Oct 10, 10:34 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Ted Unangst, (Wed Oct 10, 11:54 am)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Paul de Weerd, (Wed Oct 10, 12:01 pm)
Re: firewall is very slow, something's wrong, Henning Brauer, (Wed Oct 10, 1:20 pm)
Re: [side thread] security implcations of multiple kernel ..., Douglas A. Tutty, (Wed Oct 10, 3:25 pm)
SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong], Florin Andrei, (Tue Oct 16, 2:57 pm)
Re: SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong], Stuart Henderson, (Tue Oct 16, 3:44 pm)
Re: SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong], Henning Brauer, (Wed Oct 17, 1:38 am)