In article <20080724074745.GI22423@shisha.spb.ru>,
Alexander Shishkin  <alexander.shishkin@teleca.com> wrote:
quoted text
>Hi,
>
>I have one more patch [1] to fix three "may be used uninitialized in this
>function" warnings emitted by newer gcc. All three are unlikely to cause
>any problems [obviously], but are perfectly valid from compiler's
>standpoint.
>
>[1]: http://koowaldah.org/people/ash/netbsd/fix-libc-warnings.patch
>

Why? The first two seem like compiler regressions and the compiler should
be able to figure out. The third is more difficult for the compiler to figure
out, so it is acceptable.

christos