Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09

Score:

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Andrew Doran <ad@...>

To: Gary Thorpe <gathorpe79@...>

Cc: <tech-kern@...>, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind@...>

Subject: Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09

Date: Thursday, July 24, 2008 - 4:26 am

On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:07:34AM -0700, Gary Thorpe wrote: The advantages

quoted text> of SA are supposed to be on *I/O* bound workloads because it can reduce
> overhead due to kernel context switches by doing userland switches where
> appropriate (according to previous benchmarks, research etc.), but I could
> be wron on this.

No. In fact, it adds overhead to I/O bound workloads.

Andrew

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

revivesa status, Bill Stouder-Studenmund, (Tue Jul 1, 7:29 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Bill Stouder-Studenmund, (Thu Jul 10, 2:31 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, David Holland, (Sat Jul 12, 3:28 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Andy Shevchenko, (Thu Jul 10, 3:28 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Bill Stouder-Studenmund, (Thu Jul 10, 2:39 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Andrew Doran, (Fri Jul 11, 8:47 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Manuel Bouyer, (Fri Jul 11, 3:30 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Jason Thorpe, (Wed Jul 23, 6:39 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Havard Eidnes, (Thu Jul 24, 6:31 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Andrew Doran, (Fri Jul 25, 3:19 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Jason Thorpe, (Thu Jul 24, 12:19 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Havard Eidnes, (Thu Jul 24, 5:09 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, David Holland, (Fri Jul 25, 11:45 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Antti Kantee, (Thu Jul 24, 12:51 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Jason Thorpe, (Thu Jul 24, 1:28 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, SODA Noriyuki, (Fri Jul 25, 1:54 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Jason Thorpe, (Mon Jul 28, 11:35 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, SODA Noriyuki, (Mon Jul 28, 11:58 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Andrew Doran, (Fri Jul 25, 3:40 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, SODA Noriyuki, (Fri Jul 25, 4:37 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Jason Thorpe, (Mon Jul 28, 11:30 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Eric Haszlakiewicz, (Sat Jul 12, 2:38 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Tonnerre Lombard, (Sun Jul 13, 4:03 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Thor Lancelot Simon, (Fri Jul 11, 4:28 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Andrew Doran, (Thu Jul 24, 4:35 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Jason Thorpe, (Wed Jul 23, 6:41 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius, (Sat Jul 12, 6:41 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Bill Stouder-Studenmund, (Sun Jul 13, 4:12 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Bill Stouder-Studenmund, (Fri Jul 11, 2:13 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius, (Fri Jul 11, 12:18 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Gary Thorpe, (Sat Jul 12, 1:07 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Andrew Doran, (Thu Jul 24, 4:26 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Jason Thorpe, (Wed Jul 23, 6:49 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius, (Thu Jul 24, 6:07 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Bill Stouder-Studenmund, (Thu Jul 24, 12:53 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius, (Thu Jul 24, 5:57 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Alan Barrett, (Fri Jul 25, 12:10 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Havard Eidnes, (Fri Jul 25, 8:46 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Dieter Baron, (Fri Jul 25, 9:14 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Bill Stouder-Studenmund, (Fri Jul 25, 12:37 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Matthew Mondor, (Mon Jul 28, 2:39 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, SODA Noriyuki, (Wed Jul 23, 9:49 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, SODA Noriyuki, (Wed Jul 23, 9:52 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Jason Thorpe, (Thu Jul 24, 12:25 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, SODA Noriyuki, (Thu Jul 24, 1:39 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Bill Stouder-Studenmund, (Fri Jul 11, 3:13 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, David Brownlee, (Fri Jul 11, 9:04 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Aleksey Cheusov, (Mon Jul 14, 4:49 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Thor Lancelot Simon, (Mon Jul 14, 7:29 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Andrew Doran, (Fri Jul 11, 7:25 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Bill Stouder-Studenmund, (Fri Jul 11, 9:24 pm)

re: revivesa status 2008/07/09 , matthew green, (Fri Jul 11, 7:40 pm)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Andrew Doran, (Thu Jul 24, 4:29 am)

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09, Jason Thorpe, (Thu Jul 24, 12:24 pm)


linux-kernel:
David Newall	Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!
Renato S. Yamane	Error -71 on device descriptor read/all
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
Bart Van Assche	Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
git:
Shawn O. Pearce	libgit2 - a true git library
Martin Langhoff	Re: pack operation is thrashing my server
Aubrey Li	git proxy issue
Pierre Habouzit	git send-email improvements
netbsd-tech-kern:
Elad Efrat	Integrating securelevel and kauth(9)
Hubert Feyrer	Compressed vnd handling tested successfully
Matt Thomas	Interrupt, interrupt threads, continuations, and kernel lwps
Michael	Re: yamt-km branch
openbsd-misc:
Richard Stallman	Real men don't attack straw men
Will Maier	cron doesn't run commands in /etc/crontab?
askthelist	Packets Per Second Limit?
Harald Dunkel	Packet Filter: how to keep device names on hardware failure?


Question on swap as ramdisk partition	2 hours ago	Linux kernel
Netfilter kernel module	12 hours ago	Linux kernel
serial driver xmit problem	15 hours ago	Linux kernel
Why Windows is better than Linux	15 hours ago	Linux general
How can I see my kernel messages in vt12?	22 hours ago	Linux kernel
Grub	1 day ago	Linux general
vmalloc_fault handling in x86_64	1 day ago	Linux kernel
epoll_wait()ing on epoll FD	1 day ago	Linux kernel
Framebuffer in x86_64 causes problems to multiseat	2 days ago	Linux kernel
Difference between 2.4 and 2.6 regarding thread creation	2 days ago	Linux general

Re: revivesa status 2008/07/09

Online users