-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Mar 30, 2008, at 06:28, Matt Fleming wrote:
quoted text
>
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 03:13:52AM +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote:
>> Matt Fleming wrote:
>>
>>> 	* dctl: the devfs control device node that allows devfsd to
>>> 		communicate with and manipulate devfs mounts. This
>>
>> The first names coming to my mind when thinking about a control node
>> would be "devfsctl" or "devctl". Why did you choose dctl?
>>
>> ciao
>>      Klaus
>
> "devfsctl" seems rather long, "devctl" seems ok but we aren't really
> controlling devices. I don't particularly care what it's called. If  
> a few
> more people pick one of your choices, I'll switch.

I don't have a strong opinion here but I'd prefer devfsctl because it  
seems more obvious, natural and in line with things like raidctl,  
wsconsctl, scsictl and so on. With <drivername>ctl there's no room  
for ambiguity, which is a good thing IMHO.

have fun
Michael

PS: it should be green ;)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBR++ftcpnzkX8Yg2nAQI2qAf9EFgqgPYzz6CcdNGR1Xcj1zWchSXOtw6P
/t6MKvBu86KaO+7vbMmnsxciiJrIBsh9T/TN1fWC3T6RMMeMBN6kiadYsrfPAZGM
Q0UmVkh88JKY0YYmanYVBdAbZbJHOE2UEGizR+hOGljME8Uj0JnF/eOGLYV/0WtN
M0Nm5sGGUFQ7cbA/hIvW5a/+rJGcG1eAQEw2PRSu63+DOgBp4XmOKf7QZy59TkPY
jBa28xdO2CP+1QN0rXHqm61Pbrpe/tR7NzAcoiks2p2NniWN0IfHRi4vY3AtkYx7
iP19NOXuliROgNlqz3IfmFlwTmHiMA8n/QgNn1xYgxLQw29N90cblQ==
=Th/d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----