Jaime Fournier wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:40:28 -0400
>> From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
>> To: Andrew Doran <ad@netbsd.org>
>> Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org, current-users@netbsd.org
>> Subject: Re: Thread benchmarks
>>
>>
>> Andrew Doran <ad@netbsd.org> writes:
>>> Here are the results, comparing NetBSD 3 with NetBSD-current:
>>>
>>>         http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/sysbench/netbsd.png
>>>
>>> And NetBSD-current compared to other systems:
>>>
>>>         http://www.netbsd.org/~ad/sysbench/netbsd-and-others.png
>>>
>>> Note this is stock NetBSD-current with FreeBSD's malloc() (jemalloc) in
>>> libc. I'll be merging that some time soon.
>>
>> This is all very impressive. Congratulations -- clearly your work has
>> been paying off.
>>
>> It would be interesting if you could include x86 Solaris in future
>> benchmarks.
>>
>> Perry
>>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~ober/
> Some basic tests on a 4x P-III 500mhz Xeon with 2MB L2.
> I created one million rows and ran sysbench in oltp mode in both 
> default ReadWrite, and Readonly.
>
> Did not make use of ZFS or any other optimizations.
> Will be testing the recommendations for Mysql on Solaris.

Interesting indeed!  Thanks for that feedback!

Darren