login
Header Space

 
 

Re: Interrupt, interrupt threads, continuations, and kernel lwps

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Doran <ad@...>
Cc: Matt Thomas <matt@...>, <tech-kern@...>
Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 - 7:01 pm

On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:59 PM, Andrew Doran wrote:


On SPARC, it's really actually quite similar to m68k.  But more to the  
point, the priorities at which hardware interrupt the CPU are fixed  
(on some systems) and you actually have to enter the driver to de- 
assert the interrupt.

The x86 is "simple" precisely because of the PIC (you can effectively  
shut up the source by turning off that line at the PIC).

-- thorpej
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Interrupt, interrupt threads, continuations, and kernel ..., Joerg Sonnenberger, (Thu Feb 22, 5:59 pm)
Re: Interrupt, interrupt threads, continuations, and kernel ..., Steven M. Bellovin, (Wed Feb 21, 10:21 pm)
Re: Interrupt, interrupt threads, continuations, and kernel ..., Jason Thorpe, (Wed Feb 21, 7:01 pm)
speck-geostationary