On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:04:45AM -0400, Charles M. Hannum wrote:
I wonder if this effect might not be greatly reduced if the number of
CGs were greatly reduced. SGI did some profiling on this early in XFS
development and periodically as disk sizes increased, and I am pretty
sure that their overall recommendation is still one allocation group
per processor, maximum.
They do spread new directories over allocation groups (or did last I
looked) though using an algorithm very different from that in FFS.
Yes, I'm aware that a huge blocksize is required to get less cylinder
groups, with the current FFS datastructures. You could always use
LFS. ;-) (Actually, LFS is working well enough now that we use it as a
root file system on one of the autobuild machines).
--
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
"We cannot usually in social life pursue a single value or a single moral
aim, untroubled by the need to compromise with others." - H.L.A. Hart