Hi,That depends on who you ask...marketing guys like bigger numbers and therefore mean the 104+24 variant when they say 'WEP128'. Engineers like to be precise and usually say 'WEP104' when they refer to the 104+24 variant. Longer WEP key lengths are not mentioned in the original 802.11 standard. If you look a bit closer into the 802.11i document, you will find that the 104+24 variant is called 'WEP104'. By the time 802.11i came out, 'WEP128' however already had become such a widely accepted term that it is difficult to get out of people's heads - though this marketing term is a major annoyance. We regularly had customers who complained that they could only enter 104 bits of key data for WEP128... Atheros chips provide both variants (104+24 and 128+24), so it's probably better to explicitly speak of '40 bit WEP keys' or '104 bit WEP keys' and avoid the terms WEP64/128 where possible. I heard that some TI-based cards even support WEP256 - whatever this means (256+24 or 232+24)... Best regards Alfred Arnold -- Alfred Arnold E-Mail: alfred@ccac.rwth-aachen.de Computer Club at the http://john.ccac.rwth-aachen.de:8000/alf/ Technical University Phone: +49-241-406526 of Aachen Fax: +49-241-406527 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Vu Pham | Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Adrian Bunk | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Radu Rendec | Endianness problem with u32 classifier hash masks |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | [PATCH 0/11] ibm_newemac: Candidate patches for 2.6.25 |
