Sorry for not spending the time to reply to the mails, I've been side tracked and haven't kept up with the devel list. But here's my (worthless) two cents:I don't have a preference to either option and know no other ways. As far as I can tell, your post is very informative and I trust your judgment in the matter. Basically, what you have said (join the SPI and client of the SFLC) sounds good to me. The only question would be, are there any conflict of interest issues to have this type of relationship with both organizations? (monetary handling, administrative tasks, etc) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Madwifi-devel mailing list Madwifi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/madwifi-devel
| Avi Kivity | [PATCH 08/54] KVM: Portability: Move unalias_gfn to arch dependent file |
| Jon Smirl | 463 kernel developers missing! |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
