[CC to madwifi-users removed] Hi Alvin. First of all: it's good to see you being back and available again. I really was concerned about what might have happened, since you did not reply to any of my mails during the past two months.If that refers to the fact that some of the people behind the project try to contact you by phone, please see below. Otherwise please explain what you refer to here. To be correct, there currently is a technical problem related to one of the two authoritative DNS servers. The DNS service at dnsf.linux-consulting.com was down for some days; it seems to be back up since Friday (September 12) last week, it replies for queries about linux-consulting.com, but not for queries about madwifi.org. I think it would only be fair to sched some light on "the other side", too, to set what you said above in the right context. Several years ago you have registered the domain madwifi.org (and .net and .com). Back in late 2005, when we decided to move the project website away from sourceforge.net on our own server, you granted use of madwifi.org for this site. The agreement was that you manage the zonefile, and if something needs to be adjusted, we let you know. Since that time I was the person who talked to you on behalf of the project in this regard. This agreement worked fine, you were responsive and you did apply all requested changes quickly, within no longer than two or three days. The DNS servers were running reliable and stable for almost two years. The first outage appeared not earlier than in late April 2007, and a second one in early July 2007. No problem, since you fixed both issues quickly. The authoritative nameservers are dnsc.linux-consulting.com (157.22.35.2) and dnsf.linux-consulting.com (157.22.35.3). Both servers are in the same IP subnet. As you told me, both servers are also in the same building and attached to the same UPS device. Which leaves some room for improvements in terms of failover safety. In response to the DNS outage in July we were contacted by several users who offered their DNS servers as backup. I was busy at that time, so it took me until August 3 before I started a discussion with you about the general topic "ways to improve the availability of the nameservices for madwifi.org". At first it seemed that we disagree about some aspects, but finally it turned out that we are on the same page. During the discussion another DNS outage occured on August 13, and you fixed it promptly again. My last reply to the mentioned discussion was sent to you on August 16, suggesting a "hidden primary DNS" scenario [1] that would allow madwifi.org administrators to modify the zonefile directly, thus eleminating the dependency on you or me for that particular task. In closing of that mail I asked for your feedback. I did not get any reply from you since then. On August 28 I've resent my last mail, adding that I'd appreciate your reply because of upcoming changes that need to be made to the zonefile (in response to the switch towards ath5k that we were preparing for at around that time) - no response. I've sent another mail on September 7, adding that even a short "sorry, I'm busy" would be fine - no response. Another mail on September 20, asking for some sort of reply - again, no response. This was very unusual; in all the time we have been working together you always replied in a timely manner. What's going on? Did I upset you with one of my mails? A long holiday? Did you move to a different location? Or even something worse? These were the concerns I had in the back of my mind when I asked for help from other team members on September 24. My spoken english sucks, and in addition I was (and still am) pretty busy due to my daytime job, so I asked for a native speaker who would be willing to contact you or your company by phone. The contact information in madwifi.org's whois differs from that on http://linux-consulting.com, which I took as possible proof for the theory that you might have moved. Thus I mentioned a total of four numbers (one from whois, three from linux-consultimg.com) where you probably could be reached. As far as I know, a total of three project members tried to contact you, none of them on overlapping times. They told me that they never got a human being on the phone, and there was no reaction on the left voicebox messages. The issue with dnsf.linux-consulting.com (that still holds on) then just added to our growing concerns. Please accept my appologies if we overshot the mark by trying to contact you by phone after you didn't respond to mails for several weeks. I hope the above explanation helps to understand why we took that road. As a side note, one of your statements in our "improving availability of madwifi.org nameservices" discussion was: "i've been involved with too many open source projects that all dies due to one person control of all aspects of the project. opensource should involve and encourage as many people as possible to help in various ways". In fact we are actively working on eleminating "single point of failures" for the project, and besides the technical PoF (such as the DNS servers) this also includes administrative PoF (such as me being the only person involved in certain procedures, such as contacting you if needs be). It's pretty obvious that "have 1 contact person" does not fit into the picture here, right? Anyway. It would be great if we could now continue the original discussion regarding the nameserver setup - preferably offlist. Please let me know if I should resend the last of my mails in that discussion. Bye, Mike [1] http://www.dyndns.com/support/kb/running_a_hidden_primary.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Madwifi-devel mailing list Madwifi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/madwifi-devel
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
