Hi Daniel,

Have you looked at usbfs2?  It sounds like usbfs2 and fpusb have some similar
goals, although I admit I only glanced briefly at your wiki.

http://wiki.cs.pdx.edu/usb/usbfs2.html

Sarah Sharp

On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:57:35AM +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
quoted text
> Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> >On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:26:34 +0000, Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> >>Fair argument. I haven't actually tried sending a big urb through 
> >>USBDEVFS_CONTROL but I noticed that MAX_USBFS_BUFFER_SIZE is not checked 
> >>in that codepath. I wonder if something else in the chain will reject 
> >>big control urbs.
> >
> >But you did want it for something, didn't you?
> 
> Not exactly. I am writing a userspace USB I/O library (like libusb), and 
> during testing I realised that I could not submit a bulk URB for ~110kb 
> of data. While implementing the code to divide the request into several 
> URBs, the thought "I wonder how this works for control URBs" crossed my 
> mind. That's all :)
> 
> I published the source of my library yesterday:
> http://www.reactivated.net/fprint/wiki/Fpusb
> 
> Daniel
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel