Re: [linux-pm] Re: The evilness of struct usb_device->auto_pm

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Thursday, October 4, 2007 - 3:16 am

On Thu 2007-10-04 12:05:38, Oliver Neukum wrote:

nts to
what



atomic_t variable in the parent, with children updating it and calling
parent's callback when it goes to 1->0 and 0->1?
									Pavel
-- =

(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo=
g.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
The evilness of struct usb_device->auto_pm, Oliver Neukum, (Thu Sep 27, 4:56 am)
Re: The evilness of struct usb_device->auto_pm, Alan Stern, (Thu Sep 27, 9:05 am)
Re: [linux-pm] Re: The evilness of struct usb_device->auto_pm, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Sep 27, 12:44 pm)
Re: [linux-pm] Re: The evilness of struct usb_device->auto_pm, Pavel Machek, (Thu Oct 4, 3:16 am)
Re: , Oliver Neukum, (Thu Oct 4, 3:27 am)
Re: , Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Oct 4, 8:36 am)