On 10/17/07, Vitaliy Ivanov <vitalivanov@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted text
> Willy & Pete,
>
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 21:24, Vitaliy Ivanov wrote:
> > Following Pete notes I will rework code and give it for review once again.
> > As I said it's usb-skeleton approach that I reused during the port.
> >
> > Anyway, will get back to this soon.
>
> Reworked code a little.
>
> Issue with locks...
> Now minor_table_mutex is used to protect the minor_table structure and nothing else.
> It was its first purpose.
>
> dev->sem is used to protect device manipulations. It's a normal practice in 2.4.
> So I leave it this way. I think it's OK, Pete?
>
> So the final patch, hope it's final, no?:)
>
> P.S. Willy all the details you asked before can be found in my previous mail(description, device list, etc).
>

Hi all,

Didn't here anything on this? What is our final decision here?

Thanks,
Vitaliy

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel