Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Simon Matthews
Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 - 12:56 pm

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:25 PM, MRK <mrk@shiftmail.org> wrote:


I  can second that. At one time I had a USB backup drive that was
configured as half a RAID 1 set. This was so that the drive could
immediately be used in the event of a massive failure of the file
server.

Pulling this USB drive before stopping the RAID device caused the
machine to become unresponsive. I think it was trying to do some kind
of I/O, all I know was that a hard boot was the only way I could get
the machine out of that condition.

Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RE: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, Leslie Rhorer, (Sun May 16, 12:56 pm)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, Pierre =?iso-8859-1? ..., (Mon May 17, 11:10 am)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, Tim Small, (Mon May 17, 2:09 pm)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, Neil Brown, (Mon May 17, 6:30 pm)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, Neil Brown, (Mon May 17, 7:06 pm)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, MRK, (Tue May 18, 3:25 pm)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, Pierre =?utf-8?q?Vig ..., (Tue May 18, 4:07 pm)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, Neil Brown, (Tue May 18, 6:45 pm)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, Simon Matthews, (Wed May 19, 12:56 pm)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares!, Pierre =?utf-8?q?Vig ..., (Fri May 21, 2:00 pm)
Re: mdadm: failed devices become spares! -&gt; Solved !, Pierre =?utf-8?q?Vig ..., (Fri May 21, 2:27 pm)