Mark Knecht wrote:
quoted text
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Guy Watkins <linux-raid@watkins-home.com> wrote:
> <SNIP>
>   
>> }
>> } At a minimum I would build a 3-disk raid 6.  raid 6 does a lot of i/o
>> } which may be a problem.
>>
>> If he only needs 3 drives I would recommend RAID1.  Can still loose 2 drives
>> and you don't have the RAID6 I/O overhead.
>>
>> Also, you said your data is important.  If so, you need a backup solution!
>> 2 copies with 1 off-site.  Maybe alternate between the 2 each day or week.
>>
>> How much data per day?  How much data during the next 3 years?
>>
>> Guy
>>     
>
> OK - good points.
>
> The 'data' is very important to me. Full disclosure (and it well could
> make a difference I suppose) but the stock data is really just part of
> a medium sized VMWare image on the order of 10GB. VMWare is running on
> Gentoo and hosting Windows XP currently, Windows 7 later possibly.
> Windows is the only platform that has programs that currently do what
> I need. (And my trading partner is completely Windows based so until I
> convert him to Linux Windows must be part of the recipe.)
>
> Anyway, I try to keep my VMWare images below 10GB so that I can tar
> them up once a week and write them to a dual-layer DVD for backup.
> Once a month I move one to the safe deposit box at the bank. Otherwise
> I keep three in the house at the far end in a fireproof box. (Although
> high temp might damage them if the whole house goes up. Who knows...)
>
>   
Several thoughts about that, if you encrypt the tar you can burn another 
copy and stick it in with the CDs in your car. Which hopefully is not 
parked in an attached garage. And look at dvdisaster. It's a software 
ECC which gives you a much improved chance to recover data if you have 
issues with it.

Of course, if you have a trusted friend you can just do incremental over 
the net, unless you change all 10GB somehow. Makes for a slightly ugly 
recovery.

I finally went to Blu-Ray for full backup, DVD for incremental. I did do 
a "test once" and it worked fine to recover everything.

quoted text
> So, Gentoo hosts VMWare. VMWare maps a logical 10GB Windows C: drive
> into a bunch of 2GB files and the stock data it typically a single
> file for each stock where the file size approaches 100MB. I have
> little or no control in terms of how that 100MB file is placed on the
> drive.
>
> I haven't a clue what that really means in terms of disk access from a
> Linux point of view.
>
> Daily backups are just my programming. They are incremental and just
> sent to another computer on the network, and then also covered in the
> VMWare backup at the end of the week.
>
>
> Replying to Asdo - I'm hoping to use a more or less standard desktop
> or server motherboard with 6-8 SATA ports dedicating 3-6 ports to this
> RAID interface and then using Linux software RAID and no hardware RAID
> controllers. Is this unreasonable in your opinion for the work flow
> I'm describing using VMWare?
>
> I'm concerned about any RAID hardware that leaves me stranded if the
> controller dies.
>   

In that case you start to look at server grade hardware, big UPS, or 
multiple systems doing realtime mirroring. If you want data center 
reliability you need data center paranoia and complexity. Decide what 
you need, and people will help you get there. When I ran the usenet 
servers for SBC we had a backup data center on another tectonic plate, 
think about how safe you want to be.

Other thought: have a backup off-site which captures a few days worth of 
new data, and do incrementals often. Worst case you have to recompute 
starting from a backup and whatever new data came in since.

-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  "We can't solve today's problems by using the same thinking we
   used in creating them." - Einstein

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html