On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:01:08 +0100
Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it> wrote:
We can learn something from any opinion that different from our own.
It is clear to me that using mdadm requires a certain level of understanding
to be used effectively and safely.
I don't think that can be entirely address in mdadm: there is a place of a
higher level framework that encodes policies and gives advice. But there is
still room to improve mdadm to make it more powerful, more informative, and
more forgiving.
You mean completely raw data, no partitions, no filesystem structure etc?
Yes, that is possible. People who are likely to handle devices like that
would choose more conservative configurations.
I imagine an Email to the admin "Hey boss, I just noticed you plugged in a
drive that looks like it used to be part of some array. We need a spare on
this other array and the new device is big enough. Shall I huh huh huh? Go
on let me..."
Then the admin can choose to run the command "make it so", or not.
Yes, there is a place for something like that certainly.
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html